- The FTT dismissed Harry Construction Ltd’s appeal against HMRC’s refusal to recover input VAT.
- The appeal was based on the Kittel principle, where the taxpayer knew or should have known about VAT fraud.
- Invoices supporting VAT recovery were deemed invalid.
- The FTT concluded that Harry Construction Ltd was aware or should have been aware of the VAT fraud.
- The disputed invoices did not meet the necessary regulatory requirements.
- HMRC’s decision to deny input tax claims was deemed reasonable.
- Both the Kittel Appeal and the VAT Invoice Appeal were dismissed.
Source: claritaxnews.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Supreme Court Clarifies VAT Grouping and Time of Supply Rules in Prudential Assurance Case
- Guernsey Seeks Companies to Support New GST Administration, Tender Deadline Approaches
- Navigating UK VAT: Key Considerations and Pitfalls in Exporting Goods
- HMRC’s New VAT Error Correction Rules: Stricter Penalties and Reporting Changes Explained
- UK Supreme Court Confirms VAT on Intragroup Fees for Former VAT Group Members
