- The FTT dismissed Harry Construction Ltd’s appeal against HMRC’s refusal to recover input VAT.
- The appeal was based on the Kittel principle, where the taxpayer knew or should have known about VAT fraud.
- Invoices supporting VAT recovery were deemed invalid.
- The FTT concluded that Harry Construction Ltd was aware or should have been aware of the VAT fraud.
- The disputed invoices did not meet the necessary regulatory requirements.
- HMRC’s decision to deny input tax claims was deemed reasonable.
- Both the Kittel Appeal and the VAT Invoice Appeal were dismissed.
Source: claritaxnews.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Mandatory B2B e-invoicing as of April 2029
- Policy paper – Plastic Packaging Tax: mass balance approach and removal of pre-consumer plastic
- VAT in the UK – A comprehensive up to date guide
- Autumn Budget 2025: Key VAT and Indirect Tax Changes Impacting UK Businesses and Charities
- VAT Exemption for Locum Doctors: Key Implications for NHS Trusts and Medical Providers














