- The UT dismissed JPMorgan Chase Bank NA’s appeal against the FTT’s decision on intergroup service supply being a single taxable supply for VAT.
- The case involved whether the supply was a single or multiple taxable supply and if any were exempt under financial services exemptions.
- The UT addressed three main issues: single vs multiple supplies, classification of supply, and exemption under financial services.
- The UT concluded that the FTT did not err in law regarding the single supply decision.
- The UT agreed with the FTT that the supply was taxable and not exempt under the securities exemption.
- The UT rejected the argument that the FTT confused the concepts of predominance and principal.
Source: claritaxnews.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
