VATupdate

Share this post on

Tax Court Cases on GST/HST: Swift and Coates v. The Queen, Real Estate Implications

  • Taxpayers in Ontario often bought and renovated homes during a housing boom, leading to scrutiny by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA).
  • CRA targets consecutive home sales, aiming to reclassify capital gains as business income, which is fully taxable, and apply GST/HST.
  • Multiple property transactions may not always be for profit; life events can also prompt sales.
  • CRA assumes some taxpayers are builders under the Excise Tax Act, requiring them to report business income and collect GST/HST.
  • The self-supply or personal-use exception under subsection 191(5) of the ETA can exempt taxpayers from GST/HST if they resided in the property.
  • In Swift v. The Queen, 2020 TCC 115, the Tax Court ruled the appellant was not a builder and could claim the personal-use exemption.
  • The court referenced factors from Happy Valley Farms Ltd. v. The Queen to determine the appellant’s status.
  • The self-supply or personal-use exception test was also discussed in Coates v. The Queen, 2011 TCC 74.

Source: sdtaxlaw.ca

Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.

Sponsors:

Pincvision

Advertisements:

  • Pincvision