- A-G Ettema believes the subsidy for supporting disciplinary proceedings for lawyers is subject to VAT.
- The foundation provides support to disciplinary boards without charging them, receiving a subsidy from the Dutch Bar Association instead.
- The tax inspector and courts agree that VAT is due on this subsidy.
- The foundation argues its work serves the public interest and lacks an identifiable consumer, claiming the subsidy should not be taxed.
- A-G Ettema concludes the disciplinary boards directly benefit from the foundation’s services.
- The subsidy is considered payment for services, justifying the VAT charge.
- The foundation’s appeal is unsuccessful.
Source: taxence.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Despite major renovation of the hotel, there is no question of essentially new construction
- Partial VAT Deduction for Home Construction with Integrated Solar Panels Based on Actual Use
- Supreme Court Overturns VAT Penalty Ruling: Key Inspector’s Argument Ignored, Case Referred Back
- New General Court VAT case T-851/25 (Roenes) – No details known yet
- Dutch Tax Authority Loses €1.5 Billion to Vanishing Entrepreneurs via Turbo Liquidations














