- Bombay High Court allowed refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit on services exported to a sister company abroad with statutory interest.
- Court rejected Revenue’s claim that the assessee and foreign entity were not distinct persons under IGST Act.
- Court dismissed Revenue’s argument that the assessee acted as an agent of the foreign company.
- Assessee exported services independently without control from the foreign recipient.
- Court referenced CBIC Circular and case law to clarify conditions for distinct persons.
- Case: Sundyne Pumps and Compressors India Pvt Ltd. vs. The Union of India.
Source: a2ztaxcorp.net
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "India"
- Supreme Court Rules: “Parts” Must Functionally Integrate into Machinery, Rejecting End-Use Claims
- Centre to Consider Panel’s GST Recommendations on Air Purifiers, Tells Delhi High Court
- Sunglasses Not Classified as Spectacles, Taxable at Higher 12.5% VAT: Punjab & Haryana HC
- BMW Urges No GST Hike on EVs as Electric Car Sales Surge Over 200% in 2025
- Supreme Court: Hostel Rooms for Students Qualify as Residential Dwellings, GST Exempt














