- A court ruled that a doctor was incorrectly classified as a VAT entrepreneur.
- The doctor was registered as a sole proprietorship but did not conduct independent economic activities.
- Her partner was actually running the business and handling all administrative tasks.
- The partner was responsible for VAT filings and business operations.
- A VAT refund request led to an investigation revealing discrepancies in invoices.
- One invoice was actually a quote, not a valid invoice.
- The partner designed and managed the business processes and communications.
- The business was effectively operated by the partner, not the doctor.
Source: fiscaalvanmorgen.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Hospice performance does not qualify as exempt service or short stay
- Assessment of Dispute: Single or Multiple Services in Hospice Guest Care and Tax Implications
- Netherlands Suspends €2 Handling Fee on Non-EU Parcels, Awaits EU Customs Measures in 2026
- Decision on the introduction of a national handling fee postponed
- No VAT Fiscal Unity Without Financial Integration, Rules Advocate General Ettema














