- The Amsterdam Court upheld the Noord-Holland Court’s ruling that X BV qualifies as a VAT entrepreneur subject to reverse charge VAT rules, despite not providing compensated services.
- X BV, registered since 2009 for holding and financing activities, failed to disclose its non-compensated status, leading to the accrual of VAT liabilities from foreign service providers.
- The court found no violation of proportionality principles and ruled that X BV could have requested the withdrawal of its VAT identification number, dismissing its appeal as unfounded.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT Increase on Hotels Could Lead to Billions in Losses for Tourism Sector
- No VAT Deduction for Family Business Succession Advisory Costs, Court Rules Against A BV
- Proposed VAT Increase on Tourism Yields No Net Gain, Faces Parliamentary Vote
- Impact of 2027 Policy Change on Home Batteries and VAT for Solar Panel Owners
- Supreme Court to Decide Tax Status of Paved Parking Lot: Built or Unbuilt Land?
