- The Amsterdam Court upheld the Noord-Holland Court’s ruling that X BV qualifies as a VAT entrepreneur subject to reverse charge VAT rules, despite not providing compensated services.
- X BV, registered since 2009 for holding and financing activities, failed to disclose its non-compensated status, leading to the accrual of VAT liabilities from foreign service providers.
- The court found no violation of proportionality principles and ruled that X BV could have requested the withdrawal of its VAT identification number, dismissing its appeal as unfounded.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Industry Pension Fund May Partially Deduct VAT on Execution Costs for Employee Services
- VAT exemption for debt counselling as of Jan 1. 2026
- Senate accepts bill to retain reduced VAT rate on culture, media and sports
- VAT on residential rent by foreign temporary workers not deductible
- Dutch Court Rules Outsourced Payment Processing Qualifies for VAT Exemption
