- The European Court of Justice is focusing on intra-group settlements related to VAT and transfer pricing.
- Recent cases highlight the importance of distinguishing between direct and indirect tax regulations.
- The court is examining the market-based approach’s compatibility with VAT tax base construction.
- In the Weatherford case, the court confirmed the right to deduct VAT on services used in business activities.
- The Arcomet case involves rental fee adjustments and whether they constitute taxable services.
- The Högkullen case questions VAT applicability on intra-group real estate transactions without payment.
- The Stellantis Portugal case is about the impact of transfer pricing adjustments on VAT tax base.
- The General Advocate emphasized that tax assessments should be case-specific.
- OECD guidelines for transfer pricing are designed for direct taxes and may not align with VAT analysis.
- The outcomes of these cases could significantly impact capital groups.
Source: mddp.pl
Click on the logo to visit the website
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Delayed EN 16931 Standard Leaves Businesses in Limbo – A Call for Urgent Action
- The EU Commission proposes new collaborative measures in view of ViDA
- How did the EU Member States implemented ”Domestic Reverse-Charge” (Art. 194 of the Directive 2006/112)?
- ECJ/General Court VAT Cases – Pending cases
- ECJ VAT Cases decided in 2025














