- The Administrative Court made a decision on March 26, 2025, regarding a case involving E S in B, represented by lawyers in Vienna.
- The case concerns a revision against a decision by the Federal Finance Court dated January 29, 2024, related to VAT for 2017 and 2018.
- The contested decision was annulled due to legal errors.
- The state must reimburse the appellant €1,346.40 within two weeks, or face enforcement.
- The appellant is a farmer managing an agricultural business with crop and wine production.
- A 2017 audit report indicated that profits were determined using a partial flat-rate method, but from 2015, they should be calculated using an income-expenditure method.
- In 2019, the appellant submitted VAT returns for 2017 and 2018, claiming compliance with audit findings and submitting monthly VAT pre-registrations.
- The tax office set VAT for 2017 and 2018 differently from the declarations, citing the absence of a written option for standard taxation.
- The appellant argued that monthly VAT pre-registrations from February 2017 served as option declarations, and the crediting of input tax indicated compliance with general VAT rules.
Source: ris.bka.gv.at
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Austria"
- Austrian Court Rules No Consumption Tax or Late Surcharge on Temporarily Leased Cross-Border Vehicles
- Questions to ECJ – Quick Fixes Under Scrutiny: Is an EU VAT ID a Substantive Requirement for Zero-Rating?
- New GC VAT Case: C-689/25 (British Company) – No details known yet
- Austrian Court Rules on Cross-Border Vehicle Lease Tax Liability and VAT Treatment
- Comments on ECJ C-794/23 (Finanzamt Österreich) – No VAT Liability for Incorrect Rates Charged to Non-Taxable Consumers
