Advocate General Kokott concluded that T.P.T.’s no-cure-no-pay legal service is subject to VAT, regardless of the uncertainty surrounding the fee. This opinion came in response to a case where T.P.T. provided free legal services to an economically weak individual against Financial Bulgaria, and the court ordered Financial Bulgaria to pay T.P.T.’s fee. T.P.T. then sought VAT on this fee, which Financial Bulgaria contested, arguing no VAT was due on free services. Ultimately, Kokott concluded that the service is VAT taxable, and Financial Bulgaria is obligated to pay the VAT to T.P.T.
Source: taxlive.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- European Commission launches three new CBAM Calls for Evidence
- Comments on ECJ C-726/23 (Arcomet) – VAT Applies to Transfer Pricing Adjustments, Clarifying Deduction Requirements
- EU Sugar Taxes: Diverse Approaches to Reducing Sugary Drink Consumption Across Member States
- Transfer Pricing and VAT Post-Arcomet: Unresolved Debates in Taxation’s Complex Landscape
- ECJ Rules VAT Refund Processing for Non-EU Buyers is Taxable Service, Includes VAT in Price
