- Input tax deduction requires a delivery in the VAT sense, involving the transfer of control over an item. Mere participation in a supply chain without control is insufficient.
- A car dealer acting only as an intermediary without obtaining or transferring control over vehicles does not make a delivery but provides another service.
- Economic integration of a GmbH into a sole proprietorship requires more than shared office use or a managerial position; functional economic interconnection is needed.
- Input tax deduction is not allowed if there is no economic integration, even if there was a mistaken assessment of a VAT group. Trust in previous differing tax authority assessments does not provide protection without a binding promise.
- Input tax deduction fails if there is no actual delivery in the VAT sense. The recipient must prove receipt of a delivery and bears the burden of proof.
Source: datenbank.nwb.de
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Germany"
- German MOF Issues Second Guidance on Mandatory Domestic B2B E-Invoicing and Error Clarifications
- Federal Ministry of Finance Clarifies B2B E-Invoicing Validation and Mandatory Invoice Elements for 2025
- Second BMF Letter on E-Invoicing: Key Changes and Validation Duties for Businesses Explained
- ECJ Opinion Sheds Light on VAT for Ancillary Services in German Accommodation Sector
- Germany: Navigating NACE Code Changes for Foreign VAT Refunds in 2025–2026 Transition Period