- The court ruled there was abuse of law due to artificial structures aimed solely at tax benefits.
- The Swedish company X was part of a structure involving a Jersey company and a Dutch branch.
- The Dutch branch provided services from 2013 to mid-2018, claiming VAT deductions.
- The Jersey entity was not liable for VAT on these services.
- The tax inspector claimed the structure was purely artificial, leading to a legal challenge.
- The court found the structure artificial, denying X the right to VAT deductions.
- Penalties were annulled due to a defensible position.
- The court confirmed the artificial nature of transactions involving debt portfolios.
- The transactions were primarily for tax advantages, lacking economic reality.
- The court upheld the lower court’s decision.
Source: taxlive.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Guide to Netherlands Article 23 VAT Deferment: Benefits, Application, and Compliance for Online Sellers
- No VAT Deduction for Luxury Apartment Purchase: Business Use Not Proven, Court Rules
- Rental of Workroom by Silent Partnership: Entrepreneurship Confirmed, VAT Deduction Denied Due to Private Use
- Court Overturns Tax Office Decision on VAT Deduction for Healthcare Complex Development
- Netherlands Prepares for 2030 VAT Reforms: E-Invoicing, Platform Economy and SME Considerations