- The case involves a dispute over the deduction of VAT on invoices for legal assistance to the CEO in a criminal case.
- Both the company and its CEO are suspected of criminal offenses, leading to a criminal investigation.
- The company deducted VAT from invoices for its own legal representation, which is not disputed.
- The company also deducted VAT from invoices for the CEO’s legal representation, which the tax inspector corrected or denied.
- It is agreed that the company is an entrepreneur with full right to deduct input tax, but the costs in question are not direct business expenses.
- The court considers whether the services were provided under a legal relationship with the service providers.
- It is agreed that the services were provided under a legal relationship between the company and the CEO’s legal firm, and the company is the recipient of these services.
- The court will determine if the VAT on these invoices can be deducted as part of general business costs under the relevant tax law.
Source: uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Mandatory E-Invoicing in the EU: What Does ViDA Mean for Your SME Clients?
- Dutch Tax Authorities Announce Major Changes to 13th Directive VAT Refund Procedure
- ViDA E‑Invoicing and Digital Reporting in the Netherlands: Strategic Choices and Phased Timeline to 2032
- VAT OSS in the Netherlands: Managing Multi-Channel Marketplace Sales and Bookkeeping Challenges
- Cabinet Response to ViDA E-Invoicing and Digital Reporting Report Sent to House of Representatives














