- The indirect estimation method can determine both accrued and deductible VAT amounts.
- Deductible VAT requires proof that the amounts were actually borne by the taxpayer.
- The deduction is conditioned on the VAT being effectively supported and normally passed on.
- The EU Court of Justice doctrine allows denial of VAT deduction if the taxpayer knew or should have known about participating in tax fraud.
- The tax administration must prove the taxpayer’s knowledge of potential fraud.
- VAT deduction can be denied if the invoice is from a non-existent operator or if the taxpayer lacks proper documentation.
- The Union law requires adequate documentation for VAT deduction.
Source: serviciostelematicosext.hacienda.gob.es
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Spain"
- Choosing Between SII and Verifactu: Navigating Spain’s New Invoicing Regulations for 2026
- Spain Updates Economic Agreement with Basque Country, Enhances Tax Collaboration and Compliance Measures
- VAT IT eezi webinar – European E-Invoicing Spotlight: Greece, Poland, Croatia & Spain (Nov 27)
- Spanish Businesses Face E-Invoicing Dilemma: Verifactu or SII Amid EU’s Digital VAT Reform
- Penalties for Late VAT Filing and Payment in Spain: Avoiding Fines and Interest