- The District Court of Gelderland ruled that X and Y cannot deduct input VAT for the attic floor of their home, determining that there is no direct link between the house’s acquisition and the rental of the attic, which is considered an ancillary activity.
- The court highlighted that the primary purpose of acquiring the house was for living, and the attic’s mixed-use, including private activities, prevents opting for a taxed rental status.
- Consequently, the court rejected X and Y’s objections regarding the VAT refund for 2019 and 2020, affirming the inspector’s decision and deeming their claims unfounded.
Source: taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- No Defensible Position for VAT Fraudster, Rules Advocate General Van Kempen in Tax Case
- Smoking Cessation Programs Not Exempt from VAT Due to Lack of Required Medical Qualifications
- Payment Not Considered Compensation for Transfer of Generality of Goods, Article 37d Not Applicable
- Reduced VAT Rate Applies to Live Events Featuring Online Communities and Streamers, Court Rules
- Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over VAT Refund Requests for 2018; 2019 Claim Also Denied
