- No loss of the right to object by participating in the oral hearing after filing a motion for rejection
- The burden of proof for input tax deduction lies with the entrepreneur
- The complaint against the non-admission of the appeal is dismissed as unfounded
- The plaintiff bears the costs of the appeal proceedings
- The complaint does not sufficiently demonstrate procedural errors or reasons for admission
- The plaintiff did not request witness testimony during the oral hearing
- The complaint does not meet the requirements for demonstrating a procedural error
- The plaintiff failed to show why evidence collection was necessary without a specific request
Source: bundesfinanzhof.de
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Germany"
- e-Invoicing in Germany: Guidelines, Timeline, Scope, Requirements & Format
- Accidental Double Taxation Due to IOSS and § 21a UStG Application on Same Transaction
- Germany Mandates E-Invoicing in EU Languages for B2B Transactions from 2025 to 2028
- German E-Commerce Group Achieves Multi-Country VAT Compliance Post-OSS Suspension with hellotax Support
- VAT Deduction for In-Kind Formation of a GmbH with Car Contribution