- CJEU Case Overview: The CJEU addressed the case of Greentech, a Romanian company that faced issues with VAT deductions after the tax authority reversed its earlier decision, classifying a transaction as non-VAT taxable after the statute of limitations had expired. This situation raised questions about the principles of VAT neutrality, legal certainty, and protection of legitimate expectations.
- Judgment and Principles Established: The CJEU ruled that while taxpayers should have mechanisms to correct unjustifiably reported taxes, the right to deduct VAT only applies to transactions that are subject to VAT. If a transaction is deemed non-VAT taxable, the taxpayer cannot claim a deduction, even if they have been burdened with the economic impact of the VAT due to the tax authority’s previous confirmation of its taxability.
- Implications for Tax Authorities: The ruling emphasizes the obligation of Member States to ensure taxpayers can recover overpaid VAT when direct recovery from the supplier is impossible or excessively difficult. This highlights a need for procedural mechanisms to allow taxpayers to seek refunds directly from tax authorities, which remains a complex issue in the Polish tax landscape where such provisions have yet to be fully implemented.
Source: www.mddp.pl
See also
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ/CJEU/General Court VAT Cases, click HERE
- VATupdate.com – Your FREE source of information on ECJ VAT Cases
Click on the logo to visit the website
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Briefing document & Podcast: EU VAT Directive 2006/112/EC Explained: ”VAT Rates” (Art. 93-129a)
- Briefing document & Podcast: EU VAT Directive 2006/112/EC Explained: ”Deductions” (Art. 167-192)
- Briefing document & Podcast: EU VAT Directive 2006/112/EC Explained: ”Exemptions” (Art. 131-166)
- Less Known Facts from the EU VAT Gap Report
- Briefing document & Podcast: EU VAT Directive 2006/112/EC Explained: The concept of ”Taxable persons” (Art. 9-13)














