- The Taxpayer was a GST-registered company that owned land leased to one of its shareholders.
- The Taxpayer sold the land and ceased making taxable supplies but did not de-register for GST.
- The Taxpayer incurred legal fees defending shareholder claims about apparent irregularities in its accounts.
- The Taxpayer claimed input tax deductions for legal fees incurred while not making taxable supplies.
- CCS argued the Taxpayer had no taxable activity and was not entitled to the input tax deductions.
- The Taxpayer argued it had a taxable activity and the legal fees related to that activity.
- The main issue was whether the Taxpayer was entitled to the input tax deductions.
- TCO considered whether the Taxpayer was carrying on a taxable activity and whether the legal services were used for making taxable supplies.
- Another issue was whether the Taxpayer’s GST registration should be cancelled.
- TCO concluded that the Taxpayer was not entitled to the input tax deductions.
Source: taxtechnical.ird.govt.nz
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "New Zealand"
- Commissioner’s View on GST Taxable Activity Definition and Legal Interpretation
- New Zealand’s e-Invoicing Mandate: Transition, Compliance, and Benefits for Businesses and Government
- GST Ruling: Accommodation Supply in Commercial Dwelling and Input Tax Deductions Eligibility
- New Zealand Customs Updates GST Refund Process for Importers and Extends Application Period
- New Zealand Mandates E-Invoicing for Public Agencies by 2026 to Enhance Efficiency and Transparency