- The BFH ruled that the margin-scheme taxation is at the expense of the taxable person if the requirements of Section 25a of the VAT Act are not proven.
- The plaintiff, a used car dealer, reported sales using the margin scheme but was audited.
- The tax office discovered that the plaintiff purchased vehicles from alleged “private sellers” who were not the last registered owners.
- The plaintiff provided false chassis numbers for some vehicles.
- The tax office denied the margin-scheme taxation and applied standard taxation.
- The BFH dismissed the plaintiff’s appeal.
- The BFH found that the plaintiff could not prove the sellers were private individuals.
- The BFH stated that the plaintiff should have taken reasonable measures to investigate irregularities.
- The BFH concluded that the tax office correctly subjected the transactions to standard taxation.
Source: hub.kpmg.de
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Germany"
- Germany Clarifies Input VAT Deductions for Subsidized Service Providers Operating at Persistent Loss
- Germany Clarifies Input VAT Deductions for Subsidized Service Providers Operating at Persistent Loss
- German Cabinet Approves Law to Prevent Double RETT on Share Deals, Raises Trade Tax Rate
- Tasks and Structure of Customs: Duties, Tax Collection, Consumer Protection, and Crime Prevention in Germany
- VAT Treatment of Persistently Loss-Making Entities Receiving Public Grants: BMF Guidance 2026













