- ECJ Case C-664/21 involved a dispute over VAT exemption for intra-EU transactions.
- Nec Plus Ultra Cosmetics AG, a Swiss company, made supplies to consumers in Croatia and Romania.
- The Slovenian Tax Authority requested supporting documents for these supplies.
- Nec could not provide all the documents due to a lack of documentation and the closure of its Hamburg office.
- The Tax Authority issued a report demanding additional VAT payment.
- Nec appealed the decision, but the Slovenian courts upheld the Tax Authority’s conclusion.
- The Slovenian Supreme Court referred the case to the ECJ for a preliminary ruling.
- The main question was whether national laws can restrict the submission of new evidence during a tax inspection.
- The ECJ considered Articles 131 and 138(1) of the EU VAT Directive.
Source: vatabout.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Statistics concerning the judicial activity of the General Court
- Comments on EGC T-268/25: Danish requirement of 100% interest for VAT not contrary to EU law according to AG
- Comments on T-233/25: EGC Subcontractor cannot revise VAT base in the event of debt not paid by the client
- EU’s Entry – Exit System fully operational as of 10 April 2026
- Agenda of the ECJ/General Court VAT cases – C-603/24 (Stellantis) judgment on May 13, 2026













