- A construction company hired other construction companies for work.
- The hired companies did not declare or pay the VAT charged to the construction company.
- A third-party investigation in 2014 concluded that the VAT invoiced to the construction company could be deducted.
- In 2017, an audit was conducted on the construction company for the years 2012 to 2016.
- The audit resulted in assessments for 2012, 2013, and the first half of 2014, along with a penalty.
- The inspector argued that the construction company should have applied the reverse charge mechanism and was not entitled to deduct the VAT.
- The construction company relied on the principle of legitimate expectations, citing the 2014 report that accepted the deduction.
- The inspector argued that allowing the deduction would violate the Dutch VAT Act and that EU law would prevent such reliance.
- The Hague District Court disagreed, finding that the inspector, by accepting the deduction in the 2014 report, created a legitimate expectation that the reverse charge mechanism would not apply to amounts invoiced by subcontractors to the construction company up to the date of the report.
Source: fiscount.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- AG Dutch Supreme Court: When Does Brick Paving Qualify as Developed Land in Dutch Law?
- Benelux Study Day on E-Invoicing (25 March 2025): Conclusions and Strategic Outlook
- Netherlands Reveals Four-Phase Plan for EU ViDA Implementation by 2030 Deadline
- Easily Avoiding VAT on Webshops: A Loophole Exploited by Business Accounts
- Tax authorities do not inspire confidence that there is a regular customer with ICLs