- Excel Consult Ltd v HMRC [2025] UKFTT 96 (TC)
- FTT refused permission to admit late appeal against penalties under default surcharge
- Appeal would have been dismissed even if admitted
- Delay in appeal submission was serious and significant
- Reasons for delay not considered sufficient
- Argument that error was caused by adviser would not have succeeded
Source: claritaxnews.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Upper Tribunal Rules Cosmetic Treatments by Medical Professionals Can Qualify for VAT Exemption
- High Court Rules Interest Payable on VAT in Contract Dispute Settlement
- FTT Grants Late VAT Appeal Despite Rejected Review Request Arguments
- Property TOGCs Under the Microscope: Navigating VAT Conditions and HMRC Expectations
- Fintua Sponsors Indirect Taxes Annual Conference 2025 in London (Nov 12)