- Sonder Europe Limited leased apartments for short-term accommodation
- First-tier Tribunal (FTT) ruled Sonder’s services were subject to VAT under TOMS
- Upper Tribunal upheld HMRC’s appeal, stating TOMS did not apply
- TOMS requires supply acquired by travel agent to be for direct benefit of traveler
- FTT decision based on Sonder not altering or processing apartments
- Upper Tribunal found FTT in error, services not for direct benefit of travelers
- UT considered services supplied by Sonder were materially altered from those supplied by landlords
- Sonder’s services were not onward supplies, but ‘in-house’ services outside TOMS
Source: taxscape.deloitte.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- HMRC Clarifies VAT Treatment of Overage Payments on Land Sales
- VAT Error Correction: Amending Returns, Claiming Refunds, and Avoiding Penalties
- Court of Appeal Upholds Standard VAT Method in Hippodrome Casino Case
- Hotelbeds v HMRC: Businesses Can Reclaim VAT Without Invoices, Court Rules
- NHS Trust Wins VAT Exemption for Agency-Supplied Locum Doctors Against HMRC