- Sonder Europe Limited leased apartments for short-term accommodation
- First-tier Tribunal (FTT) ruled Sonder’s services were subject to VAT under TOMS
- Upper Tribunal upheld HMRC’s appeal, stating TOMS did not apply
- TOMS requires supply acquired by travel agent to be for direct benefit of traveler
- FTT decision based on Sonder not altering or processing apartments
- Upper Tribunal found FTT in error, services not for direct benefit of travelers
- UT considered services supplied by Sonder were materially altered from those supplied by landlords
- Sonder’s services were not onward supplies, but ‘in-house’ services outside TOMS
Source: taxscape.deloitte.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- UK VAT Threshold Debate: Growth-Boosting Increase or Revenue-Raising Decrease at Autumn Budget?
- Chancellor Proposes Raising VAT Registration Threshold to £100,000 to Boost UK Economy
- ICS2 Implementation for Northern Ireland: Transition Details and Support for Carriers by HMRC
- FTT Rules Ferrero’s Nutella Biscuits Not Partly Chocolate-Covered, Zero-Rated for VAT
- HMRC Wins Upper Tribunal Case Against Mini Umbrella Company Fraud, Tightens Compliance Rules
