- Rechtbank Zeeland-West-Brabant finds X BVBA guilty of tax abuse in the sale of plots through Stichting Y to gain tax benefits
- X BVBA indirectly sells two plots to Stichting Y through shareholders A and B in October 2011
- Stichting Y, a non-taxable entity, remains indebted to X BVBA for the purchase price
- From October 2012 to September 2016, Stichting Y sells these plots, possibly with buildings, to individuals, incurring only transfer tax
- The tax inspector imposes additional VAT assessments for 2013 to 2016, ignoring transactions to Stichting Y and shareholders
- X BVBA appeals but the court confirms tax abuse as X BVBA transfers plots just before they become building sites, retains financial risk, and acts as a seller in the market
- The court rules that the transactions aim solely for tax benefits, dismissing the appeal based on violation of the defense principle
Source: taxlive.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Mandatory E-Invoicing in the EU: What Does ViDA Mean for Your SME Clients?
- Dutch Tax Authorities Announce Major Changes to 13th Directive VAT Refund Procedure
- ViDA E‑Invoicing and Digital Reporting in the Netherlands: Strategic Choices and Phased Timeline to 2032
- VAT OSS in the Netherlands: Managing Multi-Channel Marketplace Sales and Bookkeeping Challenges
- Cabinet Response to ViDA E-Invoicing and Digital Reporting Report Sent to House of Representatives













