- A dispute arose between SEM Remont and the Bulgarian tax authority over the right to deduct VAT based on a protocol prepared by the supplier, Gidrostroy-Russia, for dredging works at the Port of Varna.
- The supplier, initially not VAT-registered in Bulgaria, issued invoices without VAT, later rectifying the situation by registering for VAT and creating a protocol to settle overdue VAT, but the tax authority rejected the deduction due to formal errors and the actual purchaser being a different entity.
- SEM Remont’s complaint led to the Administrative Court in Varna referring the matter to the CJEU, which emphasized that the right to deduct VAT depends on fulfilling substantive conditions such as VAT being due or paid, which was not the case here.
Source MDDP
See also
Click on the logo to visit the website
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- EU Parliament Approves CBAM Reforms: New 50-Ton Threshold, Delayed Certificate Purchases to 2027
- ViDA: Transforming EU VAT with Harmonized e-Invoicing and Real-Time Reporting
- EU Court Ruling on Arcomet: Transfer Pricing Adjustments Pose VAT Risks for Companies
- Italian Tax Authorities Remove Non-EU Companies from VIES for Failing New VAT Guarantee Requirements
- Comments on ECJ C-121/24: Non-payment of declared VAT does not constitute VAT fraud
