- A dispute arose between SEM Remont and the Bulgarian tax authority over the right to deduct VAT based on a protocol prepared by the supplier, Gidrostroy-Russia, for dredging works at the Port of Varna.
- The supplier, initially not VAT-registered in Bulgaria, issued invoices without VAT, later rectifying the situation by registering for VAT and creating a protocol to settle overdue VAT, but the tax authority rejected the deduction due to formal errors and the actual purchaser being a different entity.
- SEM Remont’s complaint led to the Administrative Court in Varna referring the matter to the CJEU, which emphasized that the right to deduct VAT depends on fulfilling substantive conditions such as VAT being due or paid, which was not the case here.
Source MDDP
See also
Click on the logo to visit the website
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- EU VAT Guide: Disbursements vs Recharges Classification and Tax Implications
- Hungary’s Carbon Tax Conflicts with EU Emissions Trading System Directive 2003/87
- EU VAT Compliance: B2C Distance Sales Rules and €10,000 Threshold Guide
- EU Parliament Backs Tax Code Simplification to Boost Economic Growth
- Roadtrip through ECJ Cases – Focus on “Liability to pay VAT – VAT shall be payable by any person who enters the VAT on an invoice” (Art. 203)
