- Court Decision on VAT Deduction: The Zeeland-West-Brabant District Court ruled that X BV is not entitled to deduct input VAT for renovation costs of a health centre due to its exempt rental services.
- Dispute Over Pharmacy Activities: X BV claimed it conducted pharmacy activities allowing VAT deductions, but the court found it did not provide sufficient evidence, noting that pharmacy turnover was attributed to another entity (BV 2).
- Mitigation of Penalties: Although the court upheld the tax inspector’s additional VAT assessments, it mitigated the default penalties for excessive case handling time, reducing them to €4,104 for 2017 and €5,014 for 2018.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Entrepreneur Bound by Settlement Agreement in Tax Reassessment Case on Luxury Watches Sales
- Tax Fraud Lessons: The Perils of Mixing Business and Personal Finances
- Financial Application Disruption at Customs Halts Payments, Urgent Payment Requests Possible
- New VAT Rules for Mixed-Use Buildings: Changes Effective July 1, 2025
- Guidelines for VAT Rates on Mixed-Use Properties Effective July 1, 2025
