- The ECJ judgment emphasizes the need to consider VAT implications of transfer pricing policies
- An arm’s length price for transactions may not be accepted for VAT purposes, such as TP year-end adjustments using the TNMM method
- Upward TP adjustments by tax authorities can lead to negative VAT outcomes, especially when service cost allocations are questioned
- Businesses should keep detailed documentation that supports both the arm’s length nature of their TP policy and the VAT treatment
- Future ECJ cases will explore VAT on TP year-end adjustments, taxable amount for services from a parent company to subsidiaries, and contractual price adjustments
Source: loyensloeff.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Comments on T-638/24: Double dip alert – an incorrect invoice can create multiple VAT liabilities
- VAT IOSS Scheme: Intermediary Registration Available from April 2026 for Non-EU Businesses
- Customs and VAT Fraud Cost EU €45 Billion in 2025, Officials Warn
- EPPO Investigates Record 3,600 Customs Fraud Cases in 2025, Damages Reach 67 Billion Euros
- Intermediary Registration for UK Import One Stop Shop Scheme Opens April 2026













