- The case concerned whether the plaintiff had the right to deduct VAT and operating costs for 2016 and 2017 based on 13 invoices to a subcontractor and two recorded payments without invoices
- The court determined that the plaintiff and the alleged subcontractor were related parties
- The court concluded that the plaintiff did not meet the increased burden of proof to show the reality behind the claimed subcontractor services
- The court also found that the plaintiff’s sales VAT and taxable income for 2016 were rightly increased due to unrecorded income from a sale of materials
Source: info.skat.dk
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Denmark"
- Updated DAC7 and DAC8 Reporting Rules for Digital Platforms and Crypto-Asset Service Providers
- Denmark’s 2026 VAT Changes: Impact on Education, Fitness, and Mental Sports Activities
- Denmark’s Conservative Party Proposes Removing 25% VAT on Fruits and Vegetables to Lower Costs
- Denmark Finalizes SAF-T 2.0 Consultation, Prepares for Enhanced Digital Accounting Standards
- Denmark Launches Consultation on SAF-T 2.0
