- The case is under review by the Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden.
- The central issue is whether the taxpayer’s services to the BV are subject to VAT.
- The taxpayer claims no VAT liability due to a profit-sharing agreement, suggesting services were not provided for a fee.
- The court determined that the services are subject to VAT, as the taxpayer failed to prove a profit-sharing agreement existed.
- Invoices issued by the taxpayer for development work included VAT, and the BV paid these invoices, indicating a fee for the services.
Source: uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Thrift Shops Return to Court Over VAT Collection Dispute
- Customs Court Rules Doctor Role Play Set as Toys, Not Clothing
- Adjustment of VAT deduction for services on immovable property: What can you still do?
- Government Responds to Questions on VAT Increase Impact Analysis for Accommodation
- Heijnen Maintains VAT Increase on Accommodation Despite Predicted Revenue Loss