- The court of Zeeland-West-Brabant ruled that ‘self billing’ does not provide sufficient evidence for VAT refunds.
- A holding and its two subsidiaries, forming a fiscal unity for VAT, submitted eleven refund requests.
- The tax inspector rejected these requests, suspecting VAT fraud.
- The fiscal unity appealed, presenting invoices related to transactions with four entrepreneurs.
- These invoices were self-generated by the fiscal unity and payments were made through offsetting.
- The fiscal unity did not comply with the tax authority’s request for additional information.
- The court found the invoices unconvincing, leading to the rightful rejection of the VAT refund request.
Source: taxence.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Despite major renovation of the hotel, there is no question of essentially new construction
- Partial VAT Deduction for Home Construction with Integrated Solar Panels Based on Actual Use
- Supreme Court Overturns VAT Penalty Ruling: Key Inspector’s Argument Ignored, Case Referred Back
- New General Court VAT case T-851/25 (Roenes) – No details known yet
- Dutch Tax Authority Loses €1.5 Billion to Vanishing Entrepreneurs via Turbo Liquidations














