- The court of Zeeland-West-Brabant ruled that ‘self billing’ does not provide sufficient evidence for VAT refunds.
- A holding and its two subsidiaries, forming a fiscal unity for VAT, submitted eleven refund requests.
- The tax inspector rejected these requests, suspecting VAT fraud.
- The fiscal unity appealed, presenting invoices related to transactions with four entrepreneurs.
- These invoices were self-generated by the fiscal unity and payments were made through offsetting.
- The fiscal unity did not comply with the tax authority’s request for additional information.
- The court found the invoices unconvincing, leading to the rightful rejection of the VAT refund request.
Source: taxence.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Dutch Supreme Court Refers Key VAT Real Estate Questions to CJEU, Creating Market Uncertainty
- Dispute Over VAT on Final Payment for Business Transfer and Software Use Agreement, Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court 2025
- Supreme Court Confirms: No Destruction of Ruling; No Mediation or Foreign Establishment Proven
- General Court Excise T-690/24 (Kolinsen) – Judgment – Member State of arrival competent to levy excise duty in the event of irregularity detected on arrival
- Dutch Court Denies VAT Deduction for Crypto Platform Over Lack of Direct Service to Non-EU Clients














