- Stichting X has agreements with a health insurer for various forms of care
- X receives various reimbursements from the health insurer
- X mainly uses general practitioners and other healthcare providers for medical care
- The dispute is whether X should pay VAT on certain reimbursements from the health insurer
- The Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court rules that the reimbursements are closely related to medical care and therefore exempt from tax
- The Inspector’s appeal is dismissed, the ruling of the Gelderland Court is upheld
Source: nlfiscaal.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Rental of Workroom by Silent Partnership: Entrepreneurship Confirmed, VAT Deduction Denied Due to Private Use
- Court Rules Taxpayer Responsible for Late ICP Filing Despite Advisor’s Involvement
- Update on NCTS Disruption: Message Re-injection Delayed, Next Update Expected Tomorrow Morning
- Memorandum in response to the report on the Bill on the retention of a reduced VAT rate on culture, media and sport
- Netherlands Sets Out Four-Phase Plan for Implementing EU ViDA