- The appellant competes in a commercial waste processing market with approximately 100 companies, refuting the claim that she does not operate in a market.
- The appellant’s argument that she acts as a government entity when separating packaging waste is rejected, as it does not fall under a specific legal regime for public bodies.
- The appellant argues that she is not acting as a business when fulfilling her obligations under the Framework Agreement, but this argument fails.
- The court correctly ruled that the appellant provides services for the packaging industry on a permanent basis, constituting an economic activity.
Source: uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
