- Minister Satonen’s decision to change the trade register is a good start, but tax issues are not yet resolved
- Companies have been removed from the Tax Administration’s registers, which complicates business operations
- The situation of the removed companies must be resolved quickly through cooperation
- VAT deductions for companies owning real estate should not become a cost due to removal
- Removal from the trade register cannot be in line with the principle of proportionality
- Monetary fines can be used as sanctions
- The situation of the removed companies must be resolved quickly
Source: ek.fi
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Finland"
- Reduced VAT Rate for Digital Learning Materials and Interactive Assignments on Educational Platforms
- Finland Lowers Reduced VAT Rate to 13.5% Effective January 2026: Updated Tax Guidance Released
- Finland Lowers Reduced VAT Rate to 13.5% for Key Goods and Services from 2026
- Finland Lowers Reduced VAT Rate to 13.5% for Goods, Services, and Public Broadcasting
- Finland Issues New VAT Guidance on Art, Lowers Reduced Rate to 13.5% from January 2025













