- Allahabad High Court found detention of goods unjustified in Vishal Steel Supplier v. State of U.P.
- Unlike VAT Act, there is no provision in CGST Act to disclose transportation route
- Petitioner transporting goods from Muzaffarnagar to Ghaziabad, intercepted at Hapur
- No discrepancies found in documentation, no evidence of intent to evade tax
- No requirement to disclose specific transportation route under GST framework
- Petitioner filed writ petition against detention orders
- Allahabad High Court held that there is no provision in CGST Act to disclose transportation route
- Court quashed detention orders and mandated refund of any amount deposited by Petitioner
Source: a2ztaxcorp.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "India"
- India’s GST 2.0 Sparks Concerns in Nepal Over Smuggling and Trade Deficit
- India Recognizes Intermediary Services as Exports Under GST, Aligning with Global Practices
- FISME Urges Automatic GST Refunds, Proposes 8% Concessional Rates to Support MSMEs
- India Launches GST Appellate Tribunal for Uniform Dispute Resolution Across States
- GSTN Advisory 624: New Changes in Invoice Management System Effective October 2025