- The Hon’ble Madras High Court ruled that only the registered service provider can file a GST refund application, not the recipient of services
- In the case of Tvl. Norton Granites & Properties Private Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner (ST), the refund claim by the recipient was deemed invalid
- The recipient, M/s. Tvl. Norton Granites & Properties Private Ltd., had filed a refund application for excess GST paid on construction services provided by KG Foundation
- The Assistant Commissioner rejected the refund application, stating that only the registered service provider, KG Foundation, could file the claim
- The Hon’ble Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the refund application should have been filed by the registered service provider, KG Foundation
Source: a2ztaxcorp.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "India"
- GST Cut on Insurance May Not Lower Premiums; Potential 12-18% Increase Expected
- India’s GST Council Endorses Two-Tier Tax Structure for 2025
- GST Reduction on Fruit Drinks Excludes Colas; Prices Remain Unchanged for Carbonated Beverages
- Supreme Court Stays Retrospective GST Penalty, Examines Applicability to Non-Taxable Persons
- India Unveils Simplified GST Rate Structure