- Financial holding BV X was part of a group that included BV B, BV C, and BV D
- BV X rented out a property with VAT to BV B and BV D
- BV X sent invoices with VAT for management fees to BV B and BV D
- BV X did not report any revenue or VAT in their VAT returns for 2010, 2011, and 2012
- During a tax audit, it was discovered that BV X had sent invoices with VAT but had not declared or paid the VAT
Source: futd.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT Increase on Hotels Could Lead to Billions in Losses for Tourism Sector
- Proposed VAT Increase on Tourism Yields No Net Gain, Faces Parliamentary Vote
- No VAT Deduction for Family Business Succession Advisory Costs, Court Rules Against A BV
- Impact of 2027 Policy Change on Home Batteries and VAT for Solar Panel Owners
- Supreme Court to Decide Tax Status of Paved Parking Lot: Built or Unbuilt Land?