The District Court of Amsterdam ruled that it had not been sufficiently established that X made an active or passive contribution to cat-catcher constructions, leading to a full acquittal for filing incorrect VAT returns and forgery of documents. X trades in used cars internationally, and criminal investigations have been ongoing against a business relation and two of their contacts. The court found that X’s administration was in good order, and the discrepancies between delivery and business addresses were plausibly explained by the nature of the international car trade.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Adjustment of VAT deduction for services on immovable property: What can you still do?
- Government Responds to Questions on VAT Increase Impact Analysis for Accommodation
- Heijnen Maintains VAT Increase on Accommodation Despite Predicted Revenue Loss
- VAT due to number acquisition not deductible due to participation in fraud
- Dutch Government Responds to Questions on Reduced VAT for Culture Media Sports
