- The Reverse-Charge procedure according to § 13b UStG is essential in practice but can lead to errors
- Errors often occur when it is unclear if a service falls under § 13b UStG, especially in the private sector
- Advisors should pay special attention to informing clients about the transition of tax liability to the service recipient to avoid costly mistakes
- Services covered under § 13b UStG include not only construction services but also works deliveries and other services from foreign-based companies
- The service recipient is liable for VAT if they are a business, regardless of other tax regulations they may fall under
Source: datenbank.nwb.de
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Germany"
- XRechnung 4.0: Major Overhaul for E-Invoicing in Germany
- Mandatory B2B E‑Invoicing from 2025 – Practical FAQ Issued by the Bundessteuerberaterkammer
- Input Tax Deduction under § 15 UStG: Key Issues in 25 Exam-Relevant Cases Plus Mini Exam
- New BMF Letter Clarifies VAT Rules for Company Cars Used Privately by Employees
- Germany Prepares XRechnung 4.0 for EU-Compliant E-Invoicing and Digital VAT Reporting by 2030














