- Court rules that there is no VAT fiscal unity between X BV and foundation Y
- Foundation Y cannot impose its will as majority shareholder on X
- Disputes between shareholders are resolved by an arbitration tribunal according to the shareholders’ agreement
- X BV argues that there is financial interdependence due to its 51% stake, but the inspector disagrees
- Court rules that financial interdependence is lacking and foundation Y cannot exercise certain powers without permission
- Appeal to principle of trust fails, appeal of X BV is unfounded.
Source: taxlive.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- AG: no arguable position for own VAT fraud
- Court Rules Against Higher Interest Claims on VAT Refund
- Court: VAT carousel fraud involving false invoices and improper tax deductions
- Smoking Cessation Programs Not Exempt from VAT Due to Lack of Required Medical Qualifications
- Reduced VAT Rate Applies to Live Events Featuring Online Communities and Streamers, Court Rules
