- The director of the appellant company created the ‘Kinsey System’ for hair augmentation and wig adaptation for women with significant hair loss
- HMRC disagreed that the supply of wigs and services fell under zero-rating for VAT
- The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) determined that the Kinsey System did not qualify as a service adapting goods for disabled persons
- Significant hair loss in women was not considered a disability in itself
- The FTT dismissed the appeal and upheld HMRC’s assessments and notices of amendment
Source: rpc.co.uk
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Keir Starmer Faces Criticism for Not Ruling Out VAT Increase Amid £30bn Financial Gap
- ICS2 Implementation Delayed: Businesses Can Use ICSNI for ENS Declarations Until December 2025
- First-tier Tribunal Rules Nitrous Oxide Not Zero-rated for VAT as Food Ingredient
- Understanding HMRC’s GfC14: Tax Reliefs and Compliance in Freeports and Free Zones
- UK Chancellor Considers Adjusting VAT Nil-Rate and 5% Rate for 2025 Budget Funding