- The director of the appellant company created the ‘Kinsey System’ for hair augmentation and wig adaptation for women with significant hair loss
- HMRC disagreed that the supply of wigs and services fell under zero-rating for VAT
- The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) determined that the Kinsey System did not qualify as a service adapting goods for disabled persons
- Significant hair loss in women was not considered a disability in itself
- The FTT dismissed the appeal and upheld HMRC’s assessments and notices of amendment
Source: rpc.co.uk
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- UK VAT Threshold Debate: Growth-Boosting Increase or Revenue-Raising Decrease at Autumn Budget?
- Chancellor Proposes Raising VAT Registration Threshold to £100,000 to Boost UK Economy
- ICS2 Implementation for Northern Ireland: Transition Details and Support for Carriers by HMRC
- FTT Rules Ferrero’s Nutella Biscuits Not Partly Chocolate-Covered, Zero-Rated for VAT
- HMRC Wins Upper Tribunal Case Against Mini Umbrella Company Fraud, Tightens Compliance Rules
