- The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) ruled on the VAT treatment of a system used for hair loss called the Kinsey System
- The issue was whether the Kinsey System qualifies for zero-rating under Schedule 8 Group 12 to VATA94
- Advice from VAT experts suggested that zero-rating could be available using legislation for aids to the handicapped
- HMRC opened an enquiry in 2020 and confirmed that hairweaving cannot be zero-rated for VAT purposes
- The Appellant argued that the services provided were adapting goods to suit the condition of disabled persons
- HMRC upheld their decision that the hair loss system does not qualify for zero-rating
Source: ey.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Isle of Wight NHS Trust vs HMRC: VAT Exemption Dispute on Locum Medical Practitioners
- HMRC Guidance: How to correct VAT errors and make adjustments or claims (VAT Notice 700/45)
- Supreme Court Decision Mandates Prudential to Pay VAT on £9.3 Million Success Fees
- UK Supreme Court Rules on VAT Grouping and Time of Supply in Prudential Case
- High Court Rules in Favor of Hotelbeds UK on Input Tax Recovery Without VAT Invoices