- The inspector corrected the deduction of VAT related to corrected costs such as representation costs, gifts, canteen costs, and accommodation costs. The inspector imposed additional VAT assessments. The court ruled that the appeal of the appellant is unfounded and that the additional VAT assessments were not set too high after the appeal in the first instance.
Source: uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- AG: no arguable position for own VAT fraud
- Court Rules Against Higher Interest Claims on VAT Refund
- Court: VAT carousel fraud involving false invoices and improper tax deductions
- Smoking Cessation Programs Not Exempt from VAT Due to Lack of Required Medical Qualifications
- Reduced VAT Rate Applies to Live Events Featuring Online Communities and Streamers, Court Rules
