- Calcutta High Court ruled that the Adjudicating Authority cannot rely on an advance ruling from another state
- The case involved a Goods Transport Agency service provider who was facing GST recovery and penalty under CGST Act
- The Appellate Authority dropped the fraud allegation but continued the adjudication under Section 73 of CGST Act
- The Petitioner obtained a declaration from Indian Oil Corporation confirming GST payment for GTA services
- The High Court remanded the matter to the Adjudicating Authority due to the timely declaration by IOCL
- The High Court stated that an AAR ruling from Goa cannot automatically apply to a taxpayer in West Bengal
Source: elplaw.in
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "India"
- CESTAT Rules Preloaded Software Must Be Included in Customs Valuation of Navigation Devices
- India’s GST Overhaul: Key Insights on October 2025 Tax Rate Changes and Implications
- GST Council Eases Compliance: Credit Notes No Longer Tied to Invoices, Benefits FMCG Sector
- FM Sitharaman Confirms GST Rate Cut Implementation on September 22, 2025
- Government Reduces GST Across Sectors, Prices to Drop from September 22, Boosting Consumer Demand