- ECJ ruling on the concept of a fixed establishment in Romania
- Case involves Adient Germany and Adient Romania, both part of the Adient group
- Adient Germany contracted Adient Romania for manufacturing and ancillary services
- Dispute over VAT taxation on services provided by Adient Romania to Adient Germany
- Tax authorities considered Adient Germany to have a fixed establishment in Romania
- Adient Germany challenged tax assessment and registration notices
- Dispute brought to Regional Court Argeș, Romania for resolution
Source: assets.kpmg.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- CJEU AG: Separate Legal Entities Must Act Independently to Be Separate VAT Taxable Persons
- CJEU Rules on VAT Deduction Denial and Taxation of VAT Refund Services in Hungary
- EU Advances Customs Reform with Central Authority and Unified Data Hub System
- Essential Steps for Multi-Country EU VAT Registration: Triggers, Documentation, and Compliance Tips
- ECJ VAT C-544/24 (Nekilnojamojo turto valdymas) – AG Opinion – National law’s fixed late payment interest aligns with EU law
