- ECJ ruling on the concept of a fixed establishment in Romania
- Case involves Adient Germany and Adient Romania, both part of the Adient group
- Adient Germany contracted Adient Romania for manufacturing and ancillary services
- Dispute over VAT taxation on services provided by Adient Romania to Adient Germany
- Tax authorities considered Adient Germany to have a fixed establishment in Romania
- Adient Germany challenged tax assessment and registration notices
- Dispute brought to Regional Court Argeș, Romania for resolution
Source: assets.kpmg.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- From Accounting Entry to Taxable Event: The Acromet Case and VAT-TP Implications
- DG TAXUD Extends ICS2 Road and Rail Transport Deadline to December 31, 2025
- Potential VAT Changes for Travel Businesses: UK and EU TOMS Reforms, New Platform Rules
- EU Report Highlights Need for Enhanced Customs Controls Amid E-Commerce Growth and Non-Compliance
- Recent ECJ/General Court VAT Jurisprudence and Implications for EU Compliance (Jul–Aug 2025)
