- ECJ ruling on the concept of a fixed establishment in Romania
- Case involves Adient Germany and Adient Romania, both part of the Adient group
- Adient Germany contracted Adient Romania for manufacturing and ancillary services
- Dispute over VAT taxation on services provided by Adient Romania to Adient Germany
- Tax authorities considered Adient Germany to have a fixed establishment in Romania
- Adient Germany challenged tax assessment and registration notices
- Dispute brought to Regional Court Argeș, Romania for resolution
Source: assets.kpmg.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- CJ Rules on Customs Valuation for Imports with Provisional Prices: Tauritus Case (C-782/23)
- EDPS Opinion on EPPO and OLAF Access to VAT Data for Combating EU Fraud
- EU Agrees on Temporary €3 Customs Duty for Low-Value E-Commerce Parcels from July 2026
- New InfoCuria case-law database and search tool
- New General Court VAT case – C-903/25 (Grotta Nuova) – No details known yet
