- Sales tax disputes in New York often involve transactions with both taxable and nontaxable components
- New York tax courts focus on the “primary purpose of the transaction” rather than individual components
- Recent cases like Dynamic Logic Inc. v. Tax Appeals Tribunal and Strata Skin Sciences Inc v. New York State Tax Appeals Tribunal illustrate the application of the “primary function” analysis
- Taxpayers in New York should consider the impact of the “primary function” analysis when engaging in various transactions
Source: weaver.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "United States"
- Alabama Localities Challenge Simplified Seller’s Use Tax Validity Post-Wayfair in Court Case
- Louisiana Expands Sales Tax to Include Digital Products and Services Starting 2025
- Louisiana Updates 2024-2025 Tax Laws on Digital Products and Services, Adjusts Exemptions
- Indiana Rules Generative AI Chatbot Subscriptions as Nontaxable Services Under Sales Tax Law
- New York ALJ Rules Telecom’s FUSF Fees in Bundled Services Subject to Sales Tax