The ‘s-Hertogenbosch Court of Appeal ruled that the inspector violated the principle of defense regarding the additional assessment related to VAT-taxed hockey lessons provided by Entrepreneur X. The inspector did not inform X or his advisor in a timely and explicit manner about the intended additional assessments, and did not provide sufficient detail about the elements underlying the additional assessment. This lack of communication violated X’s right to defend himself.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- No deduction of input tax for private advisory fees shareholders
- Dutch Tax Law Clarifies Data Reporting Rules for Small Business Scheme
- Entrepreneur Bound by Settlement Agreement in Tax Reassessment Case on Luxury Watches Sales
- Tax Fraud Lessons: The Perils of Mixing Business and Personal Finances
- Financial Application Disruption at Customs Halts Payments, Urgent Payment Requests Possible
