During the objection phase, the administrative body is required to make documents available for inspection for at least one week prior to the hearing. This is considered a passive provision of information. Sending documents directly to the interested party is considered an active provision of information. In this case, the Tax Officer fulfilled the duty of passive information provision by making the documents available for inspection and by sending the Tariff Calculation to the resident. The Court of Appeal emphasized that it is not up to the resident to impose conditions on the Tax Officer before being invited to a hearing. The Court also stated that there is no legal basis for such conditions, and imposing them would seriously hinder the objection process.
Source BTW jurisprudentie
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Dutch Supreme Court Refers Key VAT Real Estate Questions to CJEU, Creating Market Uncertainty
- Dispute Over VAT on Final Payment for Business Transfer and Software Use Agreement, Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court 2025
- Supreme Court Confirms: No Destruction of Ruling; No Mediation or Foreign Establishment Proven
- General Court Excise T-690/24 (Kolinsen) – Judgment – Member State of arrival competent to levy excise duty in the event of irregularity detected on arrival
- Dutch Court Denies VAT Deduction for Crypto Platform Over Lack of Direct Service to Non-EU Clients














