- In judicial cost assessment decisions, VAT on litigation costs can only be considered and determined if the winning party declares that they are not entitled to input tax deduction.
- The Hanseatic Higher Regional Court had to address how to proceed in cases of joint plaintiffs, where only some of them are entitled to input tax deduction.
- In cases where not all joint plaintiffs are entitled to input tax deduction, the internal relationship regarding the possible VAT liability cannot be ignored in the cost assessment process.
- If a joint plaintiff entitled to input tax deduction bears all the costs internally, VAT cannot be demanded from the other joint plaintiffs.
Source: porezna-uprava.hr
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Croatia"
- €78 Million VAT Fraud Uncovered in EU: ‘Nebula’ Investigation Exposes Cross-Border Tax Evasion
- EPPO Uncovers €78 Million VAT Fraud Linked to Italian Organised Crime in Croatia and Italy
- Croatia Issues Guide on Advance Payment and E-Invoice Rules for Fiscalization 2.0 Reform
- Croatia Proposes 2026 VAT Act Amendments: Extended Deadlines and Administrative Simplifications for eInvoicing
- VAT IT eezi webinar – European E-Invoicing Spotlight: Greece, Poland, Croatia & Spain (Nov 27)
