- In judicial cost assessment decisions, VAT on litigation costs can only be considered and determined if the winning party declares that they are not entitled to input tax deduction.
- The Hanseatic Higher Regional Court had to address how to proceed in cases of joint plaintiffs, where only some of them are entitled to input tax deduction.
- In cases where not all joint plaintiffs are entitled to input tax deduction, the internal relationship regarding the possible VAT liability cannot be ignored in the cost assessment process.
- If a joint plaintiff entitled to input tax deduction bears all the costs internally, VAT cannot be demanded from the other joint plaintiffs.
Source: datenbank.nwb.de
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Germany"
- German MOF Issues Second Guidance on Mandatory Domestic B2B E-Invoicing and Error Clarifications
- Federal Ministry of Finance Clarifies B2B E-Invoicing Validation and Mandatory Invoice Elements for 2025
- Second BMF Letter on E-Invoicing: Key Changes and Validation Duties for Businesses Explained
- Analysis of ECJ-cases on VAT for Ancillary Services in German Accommodation Sector
- Germany: Navigating NACE Code Changes for Foreign VAT Refunds in 2025–2026 Transition Period