- Case involves a Latvian non-profit organization (X) organizing training projects with subsidies
- X subcontracted third-party companies to provide training as they did not have trainers
- X treated fees for training as taxable services, paid taxes, and claimed input tax deduction
- Latvian tax authority denied input tax deduction, claiming no economic activity
- Question is whether X can be considered a taxable person conducting economic activity
- Latvian court referred questions to ECJ
- ECJ ruled that services provided by X, subcontracted and subsidized, are taxable
- Subsidies received by X from European funds are considered third-party payments
- Non-profit status does not prevent entity from being considered a taxable person if engaged in economic activity
Source: nlfiscaal.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- EU and India conclude landmark Free Trade Agreement
- Comments on ECJ Case T-363/25: Hungarian Tax Authorities Cannot Deny VAT Deduction Solely for Unreliable Invoices
- Comments on ECJ C-796/23: Consideration of Czech company for VAT purposes as ‘designated partner’ in violation of EU law
- Advocate General’s Opinion Clarifies VAT Treatment of Transfer Pricing Adjustments in Stellantis Portugal Case
- Agenda of the ECJ/General Court VAT cases -1 Judgment, 1 Hearing till Feb 25, 2026













